[ad_1]
“In January, NCB raided Karan Sajnani, who lives in Bandra, and claimed that they seized 200 kg marijuana from him. NCB launched pictures of the ‘seizure’ to journalists. Round January 9, in addition they raided Shaista Furniturewalla and seized 7.5 grams of marijuana and he or she was launched on bail the identical day. NCB tried to make an enormous deal by the media that Sameer was concerned in drug commerce. Nevertheless, it dragged its toes in submitting a cost sheet. The bail order now clearly says the forensic examination report had mentioned what NCB claimed was 200 kg marijuana isn’t marijuana, however natural tobacco,” Malik mentioned.
The bail order by choose AA Joglekar questioned NCB’s assertions of Khan’s involvement within the drug commerce. Within the order uploaded on Wednesday, the NDPS courtroom mentioned, the report enumerated that hashish was not detected within the 11 samples and “the idea of the prosecution with regard to the invoking of Part 29 fails”. It additionally mentioned, “other than the mentioned rivalry within the reply, nothing is introduced on file to indicate the factum of connivance with one another or that of conspiracy in prima facie.”
Malik reproduced the NCB pictures to indicate that it was clicked within the NCB workplace and never in the course of the raid. Malik alleged that even within the case of actor Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan, the pictures weren’t from the cruise ship however workplace of NCB zonal director Sameer Wankhede.
Malik mentioned that he had come to know that after he raised questions on NCB raids towards comic Bharti Singh and her husband, its officers allegedly instructed journalists they’d “repair him”. “This isn’t simply a problem of my son-in-law. We’re engaged on not less than 12 instances the place NCB has foisted pretend instances. They’re simply doing this to harass the movie business,” Malik alleged. NCB zonal director Sameer Wankhede instructed journalists that he wouldn’t be capable of reply to Malik’s allegations because the case was sub-judice, however added, “every thing is there within the chemical report.”
[ad_2]
Source