UP Police treats union minister’s son as its son-in-law: Congress

0
167

[ad_1]

The Congress cited Supreme Court‘s anger and dismay over the delay in UP Police questioning the Lakhimpur case important accused, son of Union minister of state for house Ajay Mishra, to slam the BJP and its governments on the Centre and state. AICC used the Lakhimpur incident to snub marketing campaign supervisor Prashant Kumar for his ‘unsolicited recommendation’.

“The Uttar Pradesh Police and administration are treating the minister’s son, the homicide accused, as its son-in-law. In such a scenario, how can the bizarre folks think about the angle of the police and the administration,” requested AICC spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. “One homicide accused is the Union minister of state for house affairs and one other homicide accused is identical minister’s son. And when the minister continues to be retained within the Union ministry, the scenario is nothing in need of anarchy,” he stated. Surjewala additionally stated he was constrained to discuss with happenings within the Allahabad excessive courtroom: A homicide case involving Ajay Mishra has been pending earlier than the courtroom for 15 years now, whereas verdict in one other case involving him has been reserved for verdict since February 2020.

The AICC spokesperson additionally confirmed unconcealed contempt to Kishor’s tweet: “Folks in search of a fast, spontaneous revival of GOP-led opposition based mostly on Lakhimpur Kheri incident are setting themselves up for an enormous disappointment.” To media queries on Kishor’s remark, Surjewala stated, “I do not need to react to feedback of a advisor.” Not like some others, the Congress wouldn’t have a look at Lakhimpur-like tragedies for ‘beneficial properties’ and ‘losses’ he stated. In a democracy, folks assist these “who work on the bottom. That’s what Priyanka Vadra and Rahul Gandhi have been doing in UP,” he stated. With out taking names, one other spokesperson, Pawan Khera, tweeted a sarcastic snub: “there’s a distinction between tacticians and strategists.”

[ad_2]

Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here