Zuckerberg rejects claims that Fb prioritizes income over consumer security

[ad_1]

Mark Zuckerberg, chief government officer and founding father of Fb Inc., speaks throughout a Home Power and Commerce Committee listening to in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, April 11, 2018.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Photos

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday lastly addressed the collection of claims made by whistleblower Frances Haugen, denying that the social media firm prioritizes its income over the security of its customers.

“On the coronary heart of those accusations is this concept that we prioritize revenue over security and well-being,” Zuckerberg mentioned in a post on his Fb profile. “That is simply not true.”

Zuckerberg’s feedback come after practically a month of reports out of the Wall Street Journal which have relied on inside Fb analysis offered to the publication by Haugen, who left the social media firm in Might. The tales have highlighted quite a few issues on Fb’s companies that the corporate is conscious of however both ignores or doesn’t resolve. This contains analysis that exhibits Fb is conscious that Instagram is detrimental to the psychological well being of youngsters.

“Of every little thing printed, I am significantly targeted on the questions raised about our work with children,” Zuckerberg mentioned. “I’ve spent numerous time reflecting on the sorts of experiences I need my children and others to have on-line, and it is essential to me that every little thing we construct is secure and good for teenagers.”

Zuckerberg’s put up comes after Haugen spent Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill testifying earlier than senators on either side of the aisles on the issues the social media firm creates for society.

With out referring to Haugen, Zuckerberg mentioned “most of the claims do not make any sense.” Zuckerberg additionally mentioned that “The argument that we intentionally push content material that makes folks indignant for revenue is deeply illogical.”

Zuckerberg additionally referred to as on Congress to replace web rules that decide what age teenagers must be allowed to make use of web companies, how tech corporations ought to confirm customers’ ages and the way corporations ought to steadiness giving children privateness whereas giving dad and mom visibility to their youngsters’s on-line exercise.

“Much like balancing different social points, I do not imagine personal corporations ought to make the entire selections on their very own,” he wrote. “That is why now we have advocated for up to date web rules for a number of years now.”

[ad_2]

Source

Leave a Comment