[ad_1]
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan paid a “very heavy worth” of siding with the US in its occupation of Afghanistan, stated Prime Minister Imran Khan, including that listening to American politicians blame Islamabad for its humiliating retreat hurts.
In an interview with Russia’s RT, Khan expressed his anger in the direction of American officers who’ve pointed fingers at Islamabad when apportioning blame for the US failure in Afghanistan.
His remarks come after the current Senate Overseas Relations Committee hearings for example of this irritating rhetoric the place US lawmakers accused Pakistan of facilitating Taliban.
“As a Pakistani, I felt deeply damage by a number of the remarks made by these senators. Guilty Pakistan for this debacle in Afghanistan is probably the most painful factor for us to hearken to,” he stated.
Pakistan was in a tremulous scenario when the 9/11 terrorist assaults occurred within the US. Pervez Musharraf, a basic who’d come to energy by way of a navy coup, had simply been elected president and was looking for US help for his authorities. Committing Pakistsupport to the invasion of Afghanistan helped safe American navy support, however, Khan believes, was nonetheless a incorrect name.
It alienated the Mujahideen forces, which the Pakistani intelligence helped construct up simply twenty years in the past as a part of the US anti-Soviet marketing campaign in Afghanistan.
“We’ve got educated them to combat towards international occupation. It was a holy battle, a jihad,” he stated. And with the Individuals invading, Pakistan was telling the identical people who “a combat towards the Individuals was terrorism. So that they turned towards us. They referred to as us collaborators.”
Early this week, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken confronted a barrage of questions from US lawmakers about final month’s withdrawal from Afghanistan and the makes an attempt to rescue folks and cope with a future Taliban authorities.
Lawmakers chopping throughout the celebration traces demanded extra extreme motion towards Islamabad for its subversive position in Afghanistan.
The highest two members of the committee, New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez and Idaho Republican James Risch, each assailed the withdrawal as a debacle of their opening remarks and demanded motion towards Pakistan for “double-dealing in Afghanistan”.
Bob Menendez Chairman of the Senate Overseas Relations Committee asserted: “We have to perceive the double-dealing by Pakistan and offering a protected haven to the Taliban.”
Republican Senator James Risch stated that he was involved over the Biden administration speeding to normalise ties with the Taliban authorities and the way it should not happen with out in depth congressional consultations. “We additionally should perceive Pakistan’s position on this total matter, because the Chairman (Mendez) has alluded to. It is a troublesome however necessary scenario.”
US Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida, spoke on the listening to telling Secretary of State Antony Blinken that “the Biden Administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan is proof” that “we have now acquired the incorrect folks making navy and diplomacy selections in our authorities”.
In an interview with Russia’s RT, Khan expressed his anger in the direction of American officers who’ve pointed fingers at Islamabad when apportioning blame for the US failure in Afghanistan.
His remarks come after the current Senate Overseas Relations Committee hearings for example of this irritating rhetoric the place US lawmakers accused Pakistan of facilitating Taliban.
“As a Pakistani, I felt deeply damage by a number of the remarks made by these senators. Guilty Pakistan for this debacle in Afghanistan is probably the most painful factor for us to hearken to,” he stated.
Pakistan was in a tremulous scenario when the 9/11 terrorist assaults occurred within the US. Pervez Musharraf, a basic who’d come to energy by way of a navy coup, had simply been elected president and was looking for US help for his authorities. Committing Pakistsupport to the invasion of Afghanistan helped safe American navy support, however, Khan believes, was nonetheless a incorrect name.
It alienated the Mujahideen forces, which the Pakistani intelligence helped construct up simply twenty years in the past as a part of the US anti-Soviet marketing campaign in Afghanistan.
“We’ve got educated them to combat towards international occupation. It was a holy battle, a jihad,” he stated. And with the Individuals invading, Pakistan was telling the identical people who “a combat towards the Individuals was terrorism. So that they turned towards us. They referred to as us collaborators.”
Early this week, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken confronted a barrage of questions from US lawmakers about final month’s withdrawal from Afghanistan and the makes an attempt to rescue folks and cope with a future Taliban authorities.
Lawmakers chopping throughout the celebration traces demanded extra extreme motion towards Islamabad for its subversive position in Afghanistan.
The highest two members of the committee, New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez and Idaho Republican James Risch, each assailed the withdrawal as a debacle of their opening remarks and demanded motion towards Pakistan for “double-dealing in Afghanistan”.
Bob Menendez Chairman of the Senate Overseas Relations Committee asserted: “We have to perceive the double-dealing by Pakistan and offering a protected haven to the Taliban.”
Republican Senator James Risch stated that he was involved over the Biden administration speeding to normalise ties with the Taliban authorities and the way it should not happen with out in depth congressional consultations. “We additionally should perceive Pakistan’s position on this total matter, because the Chairman (Mendez) has alluded to. It is a troublesome however necessary scenario.”
US Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida, spoke on the listening to telling Secretary of State Antony Blinken that “the Biden Administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan is proof” that “we have now acquired the incorrect folks making navy and diplomacy selections in our authorities”.
[ad_2]
Source