UN Warned of Two Risks Forward: Well being of the Human Race & Survival of the Planet

• Opinion by Neville de Silva (london)
• Tuesday, October 05, 2021
• Inter Press Service

It’s comprehensible for the President to attract the world’s consideration to the present pandemic that plagues the folks of Sri Lanka because it does the populations of most different nations that represent the UN household which have struggled within the final two years to beat COVID-19 which has introduced some nations virtually to their knees.

As we all know some nations have handled the spreading virus extra successfully and effectively than others as a result of they relied on the proper skilled recommendation and had the fitting folks within the locations as a substitute of dilettantes with inflated egos.

The immediacy of the pandemic with its day by day results on well being care and peoples’ livelihoods is seen as pressing political and well being points not like the risks surrounding our planet which, to many, seem gentle miles away whereas nonetheless others deal with it with giant doses of scepticism.

Fairly rightly President Rajapaksa pointed to the risks forward for the survival of the planet – as underscored within the current report of the Inter-government Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC) — attributable to human exercise and stated that Sri Lanka, amongst different measures, goals to extend its forest cowl considerably sooner or later.

What actually issues is whether or not these on the bottom — like a few of our flesh pressers and their acolytes who appear to suppose that saving the planet is any individual else’s duty however denuding the forests and damaging our eco-systems for personal acquire is theirs — pay heed to the president’s alarm indicators that ought to appropriately have been sounded a minimum of a decade in the past.

However what evoked a fast response was not the decision for worldwide motion to avoid wasting the folks from the pandemic or the planet from local weather change as President Rajapaksa informed the UN however what he informed the UN chief Antonio Guterres at their New York assembly.

Whereas reiterating Sri Lanka’s stance that inside points must be resolved by way of home mechanisms what aroused curiosity was the president’s sudden and surprising readiness to ask the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora scattered throughout the International North and in smaller numbers elsewhere, for discussions presumably on reconciliation, accountability and different excellent issues.

One would have thought that there could be a gush of enthusiasm from some sections of the Tamil diaspora which had beforehand proven an curiosity in being concerned in a dialogue with the Sri Lanka Authorities over a variety of points that concern the Tamil group.

However the few reactions which have been reported from a number of Tamil organisations seem lukewarm. Sure, the Non-Resident Tamils of Sri Lanka (NRTSL), a UK-based group, welcomed the President’s announcement saying that “engagement with the diaspora is especially necessary on the time when a number of challenges face Sri Lanka”.

Nonetheless, there was a caveat. The NRTSL is supportive of “open, clear and honest engagement of the federal government of Sri Lanka,” the organisation’s president V. Sivalingam was quoted as saying.

The higher-known International Tamil Discussion board (GTF) referred to as it a “progressive transfer” and welcomed it. However its spokesman Suren Surenderan questioned what he referred to as President Rajapaksa’s “sudden change of thoughts”.

Surendiran stated that in June President Rajapaksa was attributable to meet the Tamil Nationwide Alliance (TNA) however that assembly was delay with no new date been mounted.

“When requests are made by democratically elected representatives of Tamil folks in Sri Lanka to fulfill with the President, they’re “deferred with flimsy excuses”, {and} now from New York he has declared that he desires to interact with us, Tamil diaspora,” Surendiran stated reasonably dismissively in an announcement.

Although the Sri Lanka Tamil diaspora consists of many organisations and teams unfold throughout a number of continents there was a studied silence from most of them, an indication that lots of them are sceptical about how real the gesture is.

In March this yr, after the UN Human Rights Council handed a extremely essential decision on Sri Lanka, the Rajapaksa authorities proscribed a number of Tamil diaspora organisations and greater than 300 people labelling them terrorist or terrorist linked. These included Tamil advocacy organisations such because the British Tamil Discussion board, International Tamil Discussion board, Canadian Tamil Congress, Australian Tamil Congress and the World Tamil Coordinating Committee.

Exactly seven years earlier in March, the Mahinda Rajapaksa authorities banned 424 individuals and 16 diaspora organisations.

The issue for the current administration is that whether it is intent on inviting Tamil organisations to take part in talks it must raise the prevailing bans on people and teams with out which they’re unlikely to speak with the federal government.

As transpired earlier than peace talks at varied occasions between the federal government and the LTTE, the Tamil teams are most definitely to insist on participation as professional organisations untainted by bans. That’s positive to be one of many key situations, if not an important pre-condition.

It’s also evident that the Tamil diaspora is just not a homogenous entity. It consists of reasonable organisations which can be able to resolve the urgent points inside a unitary Sri Lanka, to these on the different finish of the spectrum nonetheless loyal to the LTTE ideology and demanding a separate state.

If the Authorities cherry-picks the participants-particularly those which can be extra more likely to collaborate with the administration, it might be seen as an try to drive an enormous wedge within the Tamil diaspora.

That would properly result in the excluded teams strengthening their current hyperlinks with political forces of their nations of domicile together with politicians in authorities as one sees within the UK and Canada, as an illustration, and Tamil councillors in different elected our bodies to extend stress on Sri Lanka externally.

That’s the reason some Tamil commentators already model this as a “diversionary transfer” to minimize the worldwide strikes in opposition to Colombo.

What could be the reactions of highly effective sections of the Buddhist monks and the ultranationalist Sinhala Buddhists who strongly supported a Gotabaya presidency?.

And throughout the Palk Strait there are the 80 million or so Tamils in Tamil Nadu and an Indian Authorities watching developments with a real curiosity and concern.

Neville de Silva is a veteran Sri Lankan journalist who was Assistant Editor of the Hong Kong Normal and labored for Gemini Information Service in London. Later he was Deputy Chief-of-Mission in Bangkok and Deputy Excessive Commissioner in London.

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Follow IPS News UN Bureau on Instagram

© Inter Press Service (2021) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service